AIRWORTHINESS MANUAL DOC 9760 PDF
Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume I. Organization and Procedures. Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority. The Airworthiness Manual (Doc ) was first published in in two volumes and contained a consolidation of airworthiness-related information previously. Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume II. Design Certification and. Continuing Airworthiness. Approved by the Secretary General.
|Country:||Antigua & Barbuda|
|Published (Last):||5 November 2014|
|PDF File Size:||1.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Source for ICAO Airworthiness Manual (doc ) – PPRuNe Forums
The ultimate responsibility for continued airworthiness is assigned in ICAO Annex 8 to the State of Design but the programme to achieve continuing airworthiness is a matter for the State of Registry. Depending on how it is structured within airworthinese state, the airworthiness authority may be established as a sub-component of the larger Civil Maanual Authority.
Examples may include any of the following: Furthermore, TAA recognition of another AA neither implies, nor requires, that the authority must make any changes to their airworthiness management systems as a result of the recognition.
For the DND TAA and the Technical Airworthiness Program, this relates to airworthiness certification, production oversight and airworthiness inspection continuing airworthiness. The report provides an overall assessment of acceptability and identifies any areas that require clarification through an onsite review. The national military airworthiness authority of a state responsible for the airworthiness of the military aircraft of that state.
Military Authorities Recognition Question Set. A recognition does not expire. Limitations and Constraints 4. While MAAs may closely align with many of the international civilian airworthiness processes, by necessity, military aviation has a different risk context and will employ military design standards.
Reference should also be made to M. Recognition of Airworthiness Authorities Effective Date: Retrieved from ” https: The planning phase is used to review the rationale for the AA recognition and establish the recognition plan.
While the review process includes both a desktop and an onsite review, the output of the desktop review can be sufficiently comprehensive to preclude the requirement for the onsite review. TAM Part 2, Kanual 5 — Type Design Examination TDE describes the rules and standards for the 99760 of work performed, and airworthiness artefacts issued, by other airworthiness authorities in relation to initial type certification or major design change approval.
Cranfield University Publication Authority: To enable the provisions of these two TAM chapters, airworrthiness is a requirement to identify the other regulatory authorities that are acceptable to the TAA and detail the methodology used to establish acceptability.
This also includes acceptance of FAA organizational approvals related to maintenance, design, manufacturing and materiel support services for civil-derived aeronautical products. The government statutory authority in each country that aifworthiness the approval and regulation of civil aviation. Reference j represents a TAA staff instruction that covers how companies providing services under contract to DND are recognized.
It is useful to compare Continued and Continuing as they are sometimes used interchangeably.
TAA Advisory – Recognition of Airworthiness Authorities
The process by which the TAA will undertake this recognition could include:. For operators based outside the EU, for whom Do regulations do not apply, continuing airworthiness is still managed in a controlled manner but the regulations are within the rules for the operator.
For each of its aircraft, the approved CAMO is required to carry out the following functions. Other military regulators may be organized differently, for example: Once the regulatory Section Heads have completed their reviews, they provide a ,anual of their findings to DTAES 2, who collates them into a preliminary report.
Within a military organization, airworthiness and aviation responsibility may be spread across a number of organizations, and enforcement may only be possible through internal regulations, rules and contracts.
If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user. For example, for most military organizations, operational effectiveness is paramount and, therefore, aviation safety objectives must be balanced against the need to accept higher levels of risk wherever operational circumstances dictate. It may be necessary to develop limitations and conditions associated with the recognition, based upon risk assessment of any gaps in documentation or information.
Key coordinated efforts have been sponsored by:.
Recognition, therefore, does not transfer any legal responsibilities from the TAA to the recognized AA. It remains the responsibility of the TAA to account for any differences in standards and processes, and to decide how any identified gaps are to be managed.
Cranfield University Content control: Continuing Airworthiness management is the process by which an aircraft is kept in manuaal condition where it remains airworthy throughout its life – or roc other wordsi.
The recognition process follows four basic phases:. Sustainment usually relates to the requirement to communicate any change to the conditions under which the recognition was originally issued. Recognition — Civil Aviation Authorities 4. Continuing Airworthiness is therefore not just the maintenance of aircraft and equipment, but also involves monitoring performance of products in service. For the purpose of this advisory, an airworthiness artefact is a work product from a military or civil airworthiness airworghiness.
The four sub-sections are:. For the purposes of this advisory, recognition is defined as the process by which an AA assesses and acknowledges another AA as being a competent regulator, empowered with the necessary authority, infrastructure, resources and mechanisms to ensure aviation safety.
Finally, in the military context, recognition can improve flexibility and capacity during joint operations. TAM Part 1, Chapter 4 — Assignment of Technical Airworthiness Authority describes the rules and standards for determining the acceptability of organizations that have been assigned airworthiness management roles or airworthiness functions by a regulatory authority other than the TAA.
When granting recognition, the TAA will specify any associated terms or condition.